News

SEND YOUR NEWSWORTHY VIDEOS TO VIDEOS@NEWSTALK1010.COM

Feds Announce Employment Insurance Changes

Posted By: Suzette Francis · 5/24/2012 11:02:00 AM

The federal government is tightening Employment Insurance eligibility with new rules on what kind of work jobless Canadians will need to accept in order to receive benefits.
    
The government says it will put strict definitions on what constitutes "suitable employment" and what the unemployed must do to find a job in order to get off EI.
    
The changes means Canadians will be treated differently depending on how often they have collected EI benefits in the past, or how long they are currently receiving benefits.
    
For so-called long-tendered workers who have been mostly employed the past 10 years, they need to accept a job within their usual occupation as long as it pays at least 90 per cent of their previous hourly wage.
    
The worker must become less choosy and willing to take a lower-paying job, within 80 per cent of their previous pay, after 18 weeks being on the system, however.
    
For frequent EI claimants, the rules will be far stricter, the government says.
    
Canadians who have been on the system at least three times for a total of 60 weeks over the past five years will be expected to take a similar job that pays at least 80 per cent of the previous rate.

But that's only for six weeks, after that they would be required to take any job they are qualified for at 70 per cent of the previous pay.
    
In most circumstances, Canadians will need to accept an available job that is within an hour's commute of their home.
    
Government officials say it is difficult to assess how much the new rules will save the government, but expect that fewer than one per cent of the about 500,000 claimants will be cut off.

(The Canadian Press)

Leave a comment:

showing all comments · Subscribe to comments
  1. Cory M posted on 05/24/2012 11:59 AM
    Well that's nice.. I'm skilled labour, and this means I have to go and pick up garbage along the side of the road, or pump gas, or greet at Walmart, taking that job away from someone more suited for it.. Just because I'm waiting for the next project to go ahead.. makes lots of sense. I, and a lot of other workers are not above manual menial work.. I don't consider myself to be, but some of us were willing to make the jump from the "working at Walmart" or "pumping gas" jobs, to a skilled trade. This goes well beyond a slap in the face.. punishment for trying to do better.. all the training and education, now means absolutely nothing... Why did I go back to school for?? What they didn't see coming, is people that CAN DO IT, will be looking to work for the dreaded "Cash" jobs more than ever, too bad, so sad for Canada's economy... just think.. no Income Tax, no paying Workers Comp, no paying CPP, or surprise no paying of Employment Insurance premiums... straight cash.. Yeah you guys (Gov.) really though this one through, I can tell.. lol. The thing is, I'm waiting to work on a project now, it's coming very soon, but not soon enough to avoid the changes, it will arrive around the same time. I will do very good when I do get there as it will employ me for the next 2yrs straight, but they couldn't just leave me alone until it came, now instead.. I could be pumping gas when it comes.. So... AM I going to get punished for leaving the gas pumping job to make the real money on the project when it's finished?? I most likely will!! All I have to say to "Commrade" Harper is this... When is the next Election again?? bet you won't be getting your majority, maybe even lose power all together (one can only hope)... for the average Canadian... that will be Priceless!!
    1. DanM_2681 posted on 05/24/2012 01:04 PM
      @Cory M Kudos for being a skilled worker (sincerely). However if ones job is seasonal or project to project is that not reflected in the wages? Is it too much to expect one to save some $ for the time between jobs? If that is not possible then it is not time for one to reevaluate ones job path. Perhaps the lower paid job for 52 weeks a year does pay more.
  2. proton posted on 05/24/2012 12:43 PM
    @cory m the scam artists abusing EI far outweigh the legitimate users that'll get caught in a squeeze. Don't blame the gov't. Blame all those people who continually go on EI because they can get away with it, often working under the table at the same time.

    This should have been in place 40 years ago as the abuse has been going on at least as long as that
  3. Cory M posted on 05/25/2012 06:20 PM
    Something else I'd like to mention is that it is MY and YOUR'S money going to run the EI program through the premiums taken off our pay checks every week.. The Government seems to have the "loose talk" of it will save the GOVERNMENT an "X" number of dollars doing this or that.. It's not the Government's money period, it's the workers money, they have and are doing what they want with a program that they themselves aren't really paying for... If they are going to screw with the PEOPLE'S program, then maybe WE should be given the option of NOT participating in OUR program by no longer submitting the EI premiums each week off our pay checks and pocketing that money... There for when it comes time we are laid off... we sit home with nothing coming in... For some of us that would be a better option than beating the crap out of our vehicles, paying the gas and tax on the taxes that go with it, the extra food/ misalliance expenses for a job that wouldn't really cover any of these expenses.. In fact some people would actually go "In the hole" working under this very silly idea... I for one would like those premiums in my pocket if this is what they are proposing, instead of paying for something I will not get.. simply because I wouldn't drive an hour and a half, to work for $10/hr a couple of times a week... I'd also like to point out this very same idea, the exact same one was tried 20yrs or so ago, and guess what.. it did NOT work then and it will NOT work now...
showing all comments

Videos

Trending