News

SEND YOUR NEWSWORTHY VIDEOS TO VIDEOS@NEWSTALK1010.COM

Mayor Ford Testifies in Conflict of Interest Case

Posted By: David Woodard · 9/5/2012 2:10:00 PM

Toronto Mayor Rob Ford faced an Ontario judge Wednesday to defend himself against a conflict of interest allegation that could see him kicked out of office.

The mayor - speaking in a packed Toronto courtroom - said he does not believe he violated any rules when he used his office resources to solicit donations for his private football foundation in 2010, when he was a city councillor.

The city's integrity commissioner found these actions violated the conduct code for councillors.

Some of the $3,150 received was from lobbyists who often did business with the city and the commissioner recommended Ford pay back the funds.

Prior to the council decision, Ford gave a passionate speech about his charity, which buys football equipment for at-risk high school students in Toronto.

Ford said that meeting was ``confusing'' and added that the city solicitor, who governs the proceedings, usually points out when a motion may be a conflict of interest for a councillor. This was not done at this meeting, he said.

If found guilty of violating the act, Ford could be ousted from office and barred from running for city council for seven years.

However, there's a chance the mayor could hold on to his seat even if found to be at fault, provided the judge finds that Ford made a mistake or experienced a lapse in judgment.

Lawyer Clayton Ruby, whose client filed the lawsuit, has argued Ford's conduct was ``flagrant and deliberate.''

(Canadian Press)

Leave a comment:

showing all comments · Subscribe to comments
Comment Like
  • 13
  1. James posted on 09/05/2012 02:44 PM
    Go Rob, I can't believe with all the money these people waste they are going after him for this. It just go to show you that if people try and stop 12,000 dollar retirement parties on the tax payers dime these clowns get pissed. I hope he wins and I wish he had the power to clean all these donkeys out of their money wasting seats.
    1. Keith M posted on 09/05/2012 05:00 PM
      @James This is a question of personal responsibility and the rule of law. What has been made clear by Ford's own testimony is that HE HIMSELF never bothered to read the conflict of interest requirements and intentionally chose to not attend the training on the matter when he was first elected to council. Despite being elected 4 times and serving 12 years he never read through and pushed himself to understand the conflict of interest rules in the city. If Ford is found to be guilty, which is entirely possible, then he should be sentenced as the law (which he should know) requires. If that means he gets kicked out, then it is his own darn fault, not the fault of the cities "lefties." Had Ford read and followed the rules he wouldn't be facing this, so to put the blame on anyone but Ford is defying two important cornerstones of right wing ideology (personal responsibility and the rule of law).
  2. proton posted on 09/05/2012 03:51 PM
    perfect example of abuse by left as this matter should have been put into perspective. No previous mayor in recent time has been attacked the way ford has been.

    that's the left for you. they don't really believe in democracy if it doesn't go their way, so they'll do whatever it takes if DEMOCRATICALLY ELECTED politicians aren't of their stripe.

    I'm sure if we dig deeper we'll find the unions involved in this as well.

    There's your REAL corruption folks!
  3. IsobelF posted on 09/05/2012 04:23 PM
    Give me a break about the "left" going after him. I voted for Harper as PM in the last 2 elections, so I think that clearly qualifies me as not left".

    What is so difficult to understand about why he is in court? It is NOT about the money. He used city resources to solicit donations from developers for his private charity. Then he was told by the Integrity Commissioner that he had to pay it back. He ignored this and the 6 ensuing reminders. Th Inegrity Commissioner was so frustrated with him that she brought the matter to council's attention. Council then voted on whether he should pay the money back.

    OK - here's the tricky part for those of you who think it's about the money. He voted in his own favour, instead of recusing himself from the vote as is required under the law, since the vote could potentially (and did) benefit him. Not only did he vote in his own favour he made a speech imploring other councillors to do the same. That is why he is in court - not because of $3,000 but for allegedly breaking the law.

    Got it now? Suggest you stop name calling and start paying attention.
  4. PaulL_3609 posted on 09/05/2012 07:44 PM
    I get the arguments on both sides, and if this "fund raising" was for Rob's campaign or in some way benefited him directly, I would be very much on side of prosecute to the rule of law and would expect Rob to be removed as mayor. To say this isn't politically motivated is to ignore the bullshit that is our city's political system. If you think that no other mayor or councilor in our city's history has not used their influence in some way to raise funds, benefit a constituent or contributor to their efforts then you're just ignorant. Our tax dollars are wasted everyday, but we seem to enjoy the media circus that is Rob Ford and the persecution that the "left" loves to dish on him. Despite his faults, his lack of polish and political astuteness, I believe his motivations are heartfelt and sincere. To remove the mayor as a result of this "lapse of judgement" 2 years ago would be wrong. Should he pay back the funds, sure - make it right, but destroying his political career and totally ignoring taxpayers vote giving him a clear mandate is absolutely wrong.
  5. chrissy posted on 09/05/2012 08:45 PM
    It really annoys me....MY TAX DOLLARS are paying for this....I am sure the courts could be dealing with more important things, or at least DON"T use my tax dollars to pay for it...... waste of time and money.
  6. PaulH_8674 posted on 09/06/2012 02:35 AM
    Yep, Ford did something dumb. He could have saved himself a lot of trouble if he hadn't been stubborn and refused to listen to others when they tried to point out the problem. Guilty on all counts.

    Is that really cause to remove him from office, though? It is a tiny bit of money, and not a penny went to Ford personally; further, I really don't think any of the corporate donors expected or got any particular preferential treatment in exchange for their donation. Seems to me that Ford should be given a rap across the knuckles for being dumb, and warned not to let it happen again; but removing anyone from office should be reserved for truly significant breaches. If the money went to him personally, or if the donors had been given special treatment, then yes, remove him; but the money went to kids, and he raised the money out of the best of intentions. Time to get over it and start working together to make the city a better place.
  7. proton posted on 09/06/2012 09:24 AM
    @IsobelF take your head out of the sand. Yes, Ford likely did something wrong, however the penalty of removing him from office for something like this bears ZERO balance to the offence.

    In recent times we have the "left" arranging for MILLIONS of our tax dollars to be WASTED to OVERPAY unions. Surely you must understand why? It's to get re-elected!

    So please don't insult our intelligence and deny this isn't politically motivated. Look who's going after him. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to see that
  8. kenfromcanada posted on 09/06/2012 10:36 AM
    $5,000 to $?

    Just how much is each political ass kissed, or, decision made that helps some interest group (= large corporation), worth?

    I say = $5000 to infinity.

    And those monies will be redeemed in a future postion - say as a Lawyer getting some very high paying, but, little work needed - accounts. Or, being paid a large yearly stipend to sit on some board - once or twice a year.

    Surely, one of the RECENT past mayors - benefited thusly. Or not. lolol.

    Mr.Ford - nah, when he leaves office, back to his family business, and not kissing political rear ends - won't change his fiscal (pun alert) BOTTOM line.

    And he bulls his way along - SO WHAT - he has the interest of the all the PEOPLE first, not the ones who will help him later.

    A GREAT change from the elitist politics of the past.
  9. enix posted on 09/06/2012 04:13 PM
    I don't know how anyone can defend a guy who claims to skipped orientation day when he was first elected since, as the son of an Ontario MPP, he knew how government worked.

    Read Matt Gurney article on the national post today "Rob Ford pleads incompetence"...I don't know why Toronto wants to keep an incompetent Mayor.
  10. StuG posted on 09/07/2012 11:18 AM
    Mr. Ford brought this upon himself. He's his own worst enemy.
    If he just followed orders from the integrity commissioner it wouldn't have reached this level and we wouldn't be wasting time talking about it
    1. DanM_2681 posted on 09/08/2012 09:23 PM
      @StuG "Mr. Ford brought this upon himself. He's his own worst enemy", are we blaming the victem of a witch hunt here? Perhaps he should walk tall, carry mace when around Toronto Star reporters and not dress like a whore.
showing all comments

Videos

Trending