News

SEND YOUR NEWSWORTHY VIDEOS TO VIDEOS@NEWSTALK1010.COM

Mayor's office cancels New Year's Levee

Posted By: Michelle Rosa · 12/12/2012 6:11:00 AM

If you were hoping to greet Mayor Rob Ford at the annual New Year's Levee, you're out of luck.

The event has been cancelled for 2013 with Ford's chief of staff citing scheduling conflicts and the cost.

Mark Towhey says they are looking at other options, but no word on what those could be yet.

According to a city spokesman, the levee cost $4,500 in 2011 and $3,400 last year.

Towhey insists that the Mayor's conflict of interest court battle has nothing to do with the cancellation of the event, where Ford and councillors meet residents of the city.

Leave a comment:

· Subscribe to comments
Comment Like
  • 26
show other comments
  1. Roscoe posted on 12/12/2012 07:36 AM
    Seriously? He cancels a four thousand dollar opportunity to meet with voters, but plays 250 grand to take out a bike lane and wasted millions by delaying our transit construction. Our mayor never ceases to amaze me with his epic inconsistency.
    1. len posted on 12/12/2012 09:16 AM
      @Roscoe Who can him? Why would he even risk being harassed, humiliated etc. for a "levee" that no one goes to on New year's day any. As for the bike lane, smart and proper move on his part and as far as delaying transit....I don't think it was hi alone.....look at the bunch of leftie clowns on council (and you know who they are), they hold him up and try and beat him down at every turn. He's damned does and damned if he doesn't. Cut the guy a break. Would you have gone out to meet him?
    2. john posted on 12/12/2012 09:53 AM
      @Roscoe He has always been very good at "small picture" issues: Office Budgets, one-off parties, individual constituent issues. Where he fall down are the "big picture" items such as the indirect implications of his decisions and building consensus. Like it or not, this just seems to be the way he is.
    3. len posted on 12/12/2012 10:10 AM
      @john Big words. Small decisions? I don't think so....he reigned in the unions and got a contract wothout major upset, unlike Mr. Miller, remeber the garbage strike? He privatized garbage pick up and saved the city millions. He may not be a pionstripe, coiffed "Robert Redford" look alike but he cares about the city and the people and unfortunately there are just a lot of mean spirited people on council and out there who will just jump all over everything he says and does and give absolutely no creedence to anything that he accomplishes. Tell me what "big issues" Miller accomplised, in fact tell me anything good that Miller did do for the city. The Miller regime was just a joke, he and the councillors in his pocket who juast did everything to feed themselves and all their little airy-fairy projects. Who do you think would do a better job? Sheeley Carroll, Adam Vaughan? HA HA HA. Those idiots would have Toronto sunk in no time and you know what? They're not goodlooking either.
    4. aj posted on 12/12/2012 10:12 AM
      @len bla bla bla. Our mayor is an idiot and the world is laughing at us. It is a shame. Cut the Left Vs Right crap. We Torontonians are sick of this mayor and his thugs! In order for us to cut him a break he needs to learn to behave and get along with people. He is not the mayor of the RIGHT wing nut bags! He is the mayor of Toronto and he needs to learn to get along with all of us!
      First everyone said Toronto Star was after the Mayor, then NOW magazine, and then CBC.

      BUT NOW almost all the media is reporting agaist the mayor because people cant defend stupidities.

      Mayors only friend is Toronto SUN and i personally think SUN is the FOX news of TORONTO. FICTION!!!
    5. len posted on 12/12/2012 10:22 AM
      @aj Trornto Star owns NOW magazine, CBC...welll say no more!.....taxpayer sucking liars. The world is laughing at us because of the way the media has portrayed him...ie: videos gone viral when he falls.....idiots like Paul Magder and the almighty Clayton Ruby taking him to court and what was Ruby's agenda that he would do it pro boneo....Sure he did! Get yourselves a slickster Mayor in and you will and we'll see how it goes. Ra Ra Adam Vaughan! or as you would like to say bla bla bla! Oh, and I am sure that the SUN would be soooo hurt by your putdown of them. No paper is perfect and evry paper has an agenda and the agenda of the Star who OWNS NOW is to see to it that everyone thinks Rob Ford is an idiot....same goes for the CBC.
    6. Only Common Sense posted on 12/12/2012 11:27 AM
      @Roscoe Not so much "epic inconsistency" as it is his limited attention span.
      However, the bike lane decision was absolutely the right decision.
      Get over it already!
    7. Only Common Sense posted on 12/12/2012 11:31 AM
      @Roscoe Not so much "epic inconsistency" as it is his limited attention span.
      However, the bike lane decision was absolutely the right decision.
      Get over it already!
    8. john posted on 12/12/2012 02:54 PM
      @len I never said small decisions, I said "small picture". Simple issues, straightforward decisions. I agree that he is exactly what we needed to bring the unions in check. Not everything is so straight forward though and for the most part Ford is a good guy in the wrong job. I would rather see a Hollyday or John Tory in there or maybe a centrist, if one emerges. I would, however, pick Ford over Vaughan or Carroll.
    9. len posted on 12/12/2012 03:01 PM
      @john That is really good to hear John. I agree with you 100% and you have to agree that most of tthe legions of Ford bashers are small-minded, mean spirited folks with no real criticism that can be taken seriously. They all jump on the bandwagon and just bash, bash, bash woth out saying anything constructive except petty, mean crap and I am tired of it as are a lot of people. Constructive critcism is great, mean spirited pettiness not so great.
    10. radmila posted on 12/12/2012 08:52 PM
      @aj I wouldn't be so impressed with NOW magazines opinions. It's certainly not a "go to" paper for anything but escorts and club listings.
      Yes, certainly the Mayor has made a lot of mistakes in PR, perhaps if he had the sense to employ an entourage like Miller did, at the taxpayers expense maybe he'd have better optics.
      Mind you, I'd challenge anyone to navigate the hate on that the media and the left has perpetrated on him and still be standing. People seem to be more concerned with the fact that he's fat, and blue collar looking. Torontonians want their Mayor to look like Miller. Someone who looks like they enjoy the symphony, and look good with a glass of Merlot in their hand at a gallery opening than someone who is going to make the tough decisions that need to be made for this city.
      City Council are a bunch of provincial thinking, petty, pet project pushing morons. I challenge any politician who wants to affect change to navigate that group!
    11. radmila posted on 12/12/2012 09:06 PM
      @john I like how council regurgitates Fords ideas as their own later.
      His subway campaign is a good example...getting corporate money involved. It was laughed at and fought when Ford brought it forward....now Metrolinks is considering all of those things as their own idea. Right.
    12. Brandon posted on 12/13/2012 09:04 AM
      @len "Who do you think would do a better job? Sheeley Carroll, Adam Vaughan? HA HA HA. Those idiots would have Toronto sunk in no time and you know what? They're not goodlooking either."

      I agree, mean spirited pettiness is not so great. If I want to speak out against Rob Ford, I will stick to the issues and not call names. Kindly do the same and follow your own words.

      :)
    13. len posted on 12/13/2012 09:18 AM
      @Brandon Hey Brandon, #1 they are mean, petty idiots (Carroll and Vaughan) and number 2 I was making a point about them not being goodlooking either because of all the people that bring to attention Ford's staure, looks, and his alleged lack of sophistication, Ford haters and the 2 councillors I mentioned are always doing that, so please get off your high horse and stop pretending I was offending your sensitivities, you're a bright boy, you knew what I meant.
    14. Brandon posted on 12/13/2012 01:24 PM
      @len No high horse here. Just find it odd to want people to act civilly in the same breath as calling people idiots. I agree that Ford's stature has nothing to do with politics, and it is ridiculous when people bring that up. I don't agree with it at all, being a larger man myself (man, not boy). You can easily speak out against Vaughan and Carroll without resorting to the sort of low brow attacks that you are upset at the Ford haters for using.

      I don't like how Ford handles himself. I am a "lefty". I can talk about Ford without lowering myself to base insults attacking his body or intellect.

      You also weren't offending my sensitivites. I was merely calling out your call for civility while using uncivil words. If you didn't ask for civility from the "Ford Haters" then I would never have said a single thing.
    15. len posted on 12/13/2012 01:43 PM
      @Brandon I will reiterate Brandon.....I was making a point, and you know it. You are just calling me out on something trivial because you don't like my views. Again, I was making a point. You are a bright man read all the comments, you will know that is exactly what I was doing. Also, listen to some of Vaughan and Carroll's comments, old footage, read some of their comments and again, you will get my point. ie: Carroll saying that she was going to run for Mayor and do it a "damn sight better than Ford and hoestly too", mean and idiotic comment. Vaughan "We can run this city without a mayor, we've been doing it for a long time any way" again...mean and idiotic. So please, don't accuse me of being uncivil, look at your fellow Ford haters and there you will sse the epitome of uncivil
    16. Brandon posted on 12/13/2012 02:18 PM
      @len No to be honest I only called it out because it looked and read hypocritically. There are many people that champion Rob Ford on this site and many others, and many people use much more vile words when talking about those on the left or the center. If I was just commenting to you because of your views I would then by all accounts do so on many other posts.

      Also I wouldn't jump to conclusions and call me a Rob Ford Hater and lump me in that group. Unless you mean that disagreeing with the way Rob Ford handles things politically and not being on the right-wing automatically makes someone a Rob Ford Hater.

      Rob Ford seems like a good person. He loves helping kids and coaching football, no one can fault him for that. What I can call out (and would do so if he was on the left as well) is neglecting his duties as a mayor to go and coach football like when he left part way through a council meeting to do so.

      I can call him out on not participating in the gay pride parade as a Mayor of one of the largest cities in North America. The cottage is always going to be there, year round, but the Pride Parade is once a year.

      I can call him out for not realizing that he is in the spotlight as a mayor of one of the largest cities in North America and does things like reading while driving, texting while driving, talking on the phone while driving, flipping off a mom and her child when they confront him about it.

      I will be honest in the fact that I don't know much about Vaughan or Carroll. I mean I am not a Torontonian, I am from the Niagara Region. Adam Vaughan does seem a bit pretentious from what I have heard from him on 1010, but nothing I have heard from Carroll makes her sound like an idiot.

      And quite frankly I am getting sick of the left and right infighting as well. Neither side seems to want to try and play ball and both sides seem to hurl venom. The Ford brothers are no exception to this either.
    17. len posted on 12/13/2012 02:27 PM
      @Brandon Well put Brandon, I can't and I won't argue with you on any of these points!

Videos

Trending