News

SEND YOUR NEWSWORTHY VIDEOS TO VIDEOS@NEWSTALK1010.COM

AUDIO: Police chief wants to bring back photo radar

Posted By: Justine Lewkowicz · 1/9/2013 6:10:00 AM

Chief Bill Blair wants to bring back photo radar and expand the red-light camera program to help keep police costs down.

He told Newstalk 1010's John Tory Tuesday afternoon that technology is the most efficient way to enforce the speed laws.

"Why are we tying up expensive, well-trained police resources doing this kind of static traffic enforcement where you have tie up the officer to do the ticketing and then pay him to go to court," Blair says. "If you use technology to do it, then you save an enormous amount of that cost."

By using technology, Blair says police can free up money to keep communities safer.

"I don't want to waste valuable police resources," he says.

The police budget still has a $8.7-million hole this year. The board has frozen hiring in 2013 to keep costs down.

"We're going to have fewer [resources] with the new budget constraints imposed upon us," Blair says. "We want to make sure that we're using the officers we have to the best possible effect. I need them in the neighbourhoods. I need them in the cars. I need them to respond to people's calls for service and emergencies."

Toronto has almost 90 red-light cameras, but provincial legislation does not allow photo radar to catch speeders.

Leave a comment:

showing all comments · Subscribe to comments
  1. DMCP posted on 01/09/2013 08:47 AM
    The police do not lay in wait to catch vehicles running red lights, they lay in wait to catch speeders - so what changes? Ditch photo radar and ditch Chief Blair. Oh and btw in the interest of political correctness why do we call the head of our police force a Chief? Surely the PC dogoders can come up with another title that represents all the people in the 21st century.
  2. Marcus posted on 01/09/2013 08:54 AM
    Let's spend this money on better driver training and try to nip the problem in the bud instead of trying to fix the problem on the other end. We have way too many drivers out there that follow too closely, weave in and out, don't let people in and drive far too aggressively. All of these accident causing problems happen at low speeds too. Speeding isn't the issue, poor driver training is.
  3. CoffeeCon posted on 01/09/2013 09:19 AM
    1) This is just offloading costs to the courts, and I would argue that the court cost is higher than the red light ticket; it's the verbal correction from the officer that has the preventative value.

    2) If you have officers trolling intersections; could you please post them at yonge & finch and bayview & sheppard where there is a preponderance of people u-turning on the advanced green IN THE INTERSECTION please.
  4. proton posted on 01/09/2013 09:43 AM
    1. we have too many cops focusing on trivia. prioritize and we have more than enough.
    2. Toronto (perhaps Ontario) apparently has highest rate of charges dismissed in Canada (perhaps N. America). Stop the wastefulness of spurious charges and that will free up the courts, require fewer wasted police hours, fewer wasted citizen hours, lower costs for ALL, then our police can focus on serious matters.

    can't expect the police to willingly go along with the above. It'll take a premier and the attorney general to make this happen.

    Will they have what it takes?
  5. ReneB posted on 01/09/2013 03:45 PM
    If photo radar is as financially efficient as Chief Blair says, then there's absolutely no reason to not (re)introduce it. My problem with it, however, is that it will surely only fine drivers that drive a departed speed ABOVE the speed limit and omit those that drive substantially BELOW the speed limit. When speed is a factor in an accident, it's the difference in speed that is the root cause, not the nominal speed of the faster vehicle. If a vehicle on the 401 is doing 100km/h and hits another car that's merging and only doing 50km/h that is no different that a car doing 150 and hitting someone doing 100. Another problem is it only addresses (and vilifies) speeders when stats have shown that speeding causes a small percentage of accidents. Acts of stupidity such as driving with earphones in, talking/texting on cell phones, eating, drinking, shaving, and reading the newspaper are far more detrimental than driving above a superficially low speed limit.
showing all comments

Videos

Trending