News

SEND YOUR NEWSWORTHY VIDEOS TO VIDEOS@NEWSTALK1010.COM

BREAKING: Labour Board Rules ETFO Protest is Unlawful

Posted By: Michelle Rosa · 1/11/2013 4:18:00 AM

The meeting took over 12 hours, but in the end, the Ontario Labour Relations Board has ruled that a  planned walkout Friday by the province's public elementary school teachers is an illegal strike.

The decision came down just before 4 a.m. on Friday, and only a few hours before thousands of educators were due to stage a one-day walkout in protest of the governing Liberals' decision to impose two-year contracts under a controversial anti-strike law.

At least eight school boards decided to close their schools in anticipation of the protest, according to the Elementary Teachers' Federation of Ontario. They were: Toronto, York, Halton, Kawartha Pine Ridge, Grand Erie, Greater Essex, Ottawa and Renfrew. Durham and Peel Regions had said that schools would be closed, but also asked parents to check for updates come morning.

The ruling may also alter the fate of a similar walkout planned for Jan. 16 by the union representing high-school teachers.

Under Ontario's labour laws, engaging in illegal strike activity can carry a penalty of up to $2,000 per person and up to $25,000 for a trade union.

ETFO and other supporters argued during the hearing that it wasn't a strike, but a political protest that's protected under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Government lawyers, who asked for the cease-and-desist order, countered that any withdrawal of services would be illegal, as the teachers were no longer in a legal strike position once the contracts were imposed.

(Some files by Canadian Press)

Leave a comment:

showing all comments · Subscribe to comments
Comment Like
  • 16
  1. Richard Collins posted on 01/11/2013 07:42 AM
    Finally, the law stands up for the people of Ontario against the criminals in the ETFO.
    1. ah posted on 01/11/2013 07:57 AM
      @Richard Collins What do you do, Richard? They're coming after you next. They're just starting with the labour force least likely to leave people stranded. The 'criminals' that you describe are trying to prevent your grandchildren from living in a dictatorship.
    2. Seriously posted on 01/11/2013 07:57 AM
      @Richard Collins Seriously, you idiot....... If they can legislate no rights......they can legislate anything. I hope they come after your profession next. They are dictating what will happen and the last time I looked we have a democracy in this country.....
  2. proton posted on 01/11/2013 10:01 AM
    We won't know until late this year whether the gov't bill was legal or not. That is the correct way to address the matter, through the courts.

    By fighting the bill illegally the unions and their workers are breaking the law. Simply because they don't like it and they HAD a lot of public support for their position doesn't mean they're right and therefore can simply ignore the Bill. Actions like that are commonly referred to as "mob rule". Is that what teachers want to teach their students?

    I believe there are 3 reasons the unions and teachers have lost so much support -

    1. Their contracts were legal and odious. The private sector has been taking it on the chin for a very long time, watching their income suffer while the public sector rolls along as though money grows on trees.

    2. the fight with the gov't is partly about freedom to negotiate and partly about money. Anyone suggesting otherwise is disingenuous. When they already have an odious contract and are fighting for more money that becomes more odious.

    3. the unions and teachers decided to punish the students and their parents. Big tactical error. They can't claim to care about the students and disrupt their education at the same time.

    You can't suck and blow at the same time.

    Had the teachers continued to work without disruption and REALLY demonstrated this was only about the right to negotiate only point 1 above would have worked against them instead of all 3 points.
  3. tertle posted on 01/11/2013 03:05 PM
    Fight for your rights, for democracy but why didn't this protest happen while the teachers were on Christmas break or a PD Day? You might have found others marching with you. Why disrupt everyone else's work days and keep the kids out of class? What does a one day protest/strike achieve? I've heard it said that the parents are whining about having to pay day care costs and having to scramble to make other arrangements and why not. Some parents have to take their kids to work, take an unpaid day or use a vacation day. Where are their rights? We pay enough in taxes to have our kids educated. We expect them to be.
    1. Jack posted on 01/11/2013 07:40 PM
      @tertle It's because the teacher's union is lying through it's teeth. They don't want to give up their cushy extortion tactic of holding our kids hostage every time the province wants to negotiate, because then they won't be able to avoid negotiations entirely and scream "GIVE US WHAT WE WANT OR WE HURT THE KIDS!"

      The ETFO is nothing but a criminal gang, it should be classified as such and any members who don't sever ties with it should face time in federal prison.
  4. ggg posted on 01/11/2013 08:01 PM
    They don't protest on Christmas or PA Days for a reason. Was there any media around the August protests that were occurring in Ontario this summer? No. A protest is meant to stir media coverage. With teaching, that would only occur from Mon - Fri, during the work year.
    1. tertle posted on 01/12/2013 09:42 AM
      @ggg I remember media coverage about the August 28th protest at the Ontario Legislature. It was covered by the Sun, The Globe and Mail, CBC, 680 news etc. Is this not media coverage? I believe it was reported that 4000-6000 rallied. Out of a work force of how many thousands?

      Articles can still be found online.
showing all comments

Videos

Trending