NEWS
 
Ottawa to argue against EU ban of seal products at international hearing
Tories maintain seal harvest is humane, sustainable and well-regulated
1 0
The Canadian Press

An international trade organization will hear arguments from Ottawa on Monday in an appeal of a landmark ruling that upheld the European Union's ban on imported seal products.

Environment Minister Leona Aglukkaq said she will argue at the three-day World Trade Organization hearing in Geneva what the Tories have steadfastly defended, that the seal harvest is humane, sustainable and well-regulated.

"Any views to the contrary are based on myths, misinformation and misguided emotion," said Aglukkaq said in an opinion editorial released Sunday.

"Canadian coastal and northern communities continue to depend upon the humane seal harvest as a vital economic activity and they should have every right to do so."

A WTO dispute settlement panel upheld the EU's embargo on imported seal products in November, saying that while it undermines fair trade, those restrictions can be justified on ``public moral concerns'' for animal welfare.

At issue was a challenge by Canada and Norway of the 28-member EU's 2010 ban on the import and sale of seal fur, meat, blubber and other products.

Aglukkaq said the ban undercuts the livelihood of sealers who rely on the industry to support their families.

"We will continue to work with Canadian sealers to defend this industry as a healthy, humane and sustainable source of food, clothing and income," she said.

Animal rights advocates say the commercial hunt is a needless slaughter and have called the trade ruling a major victory that protects aboriginal hunts.

But critics of the decision, including Inuit hunters, said the European ban and others like it all but wipe out major international markets. They also warned of a dangerous precedent that could be used against other commercial animal products such as beef, pork and poultry.

Regardless of the outcome of the appeal, Sheryl Fink of the International Fund for Animal Welfare said proponents of the seal industry are fighting a losing battle.

"It's a slaughter for a luxury product that people no longer require," Fink said on Sunday from Geneva, where she will attend the hearing as an observer. "Two hundred years ago, we had a reason to kill seals. It was for their blubber that was used to light lamps and to heat buildings."

"That need no longer exists and we're trying to keep an industry alive that really isn't necessary in the 21st century."

The federal Fisheries Department has said that as of this year, all licence holders taking part in the commercial hunt must complete training on its accepted three-step kill process.

It involves first shooting or striking the animal on the head with a hakapik or club, then ensuring the seal is dead before cutting major arteries and bleeding it for at least a minute before skinning it.

The commercial seal hunt off Newfoundland last spring landed about 91,000 harp seals, up from 69,000 the year before, but far short of the federal quota of 400,000. About 900,000 seals are hunted around the world each year, according to the European Commission.

Canada, Norway, Greenland and Namibia all have commercial seal hunts. Countries with bans on imported seal products include the U.S., Mexico, Russia and Taiwan.

Leave a comment:

showing all comments · Subscribe to comments
  1. john posted on 03/17/2014 11:48 AM
    zyzkenny nobody is buying our crap .


    it is a bunch of BS anyways . all these rich people and movie stars who go out there and harass these people trying to make a living . i say if thay wanna stop people from doing it movie stars and rich people should give them money to leave the seals alone . these guys have mortgages ex wifes child support to pay . there is only one session were thay can make money . .
showing all comments

@NEWSTALK1010

Facebook

DON'T MISS

SICKKIDS

YOU MADE A DIFFERENCE

THANK YOU -- to everyone who donated this past weekend to SickKids. Together we raised over $500,000! See pictures here

NEWS ALERTS

STAY CONNECTED

Sign up for out Breaking News Alerts and receive up-to-the-minute coverage of the top stories of the day

 
1 0
The Canadian Press

An international trade organization will hear arguments from Ottawa on Monday in an appeal of a landmark ruling that upheld the European Union's ban on imported seal products.

Environment Minister Leona Aglukkaq said she will argue at the three-day World Trade Organization hearing in Geneva what the Tories have steadfastly defended, that the seal harvest is humane, sustainable and well-regulated.

"Any views to the contrary are based on myths, misinformation and misguided emotion," said Aglukkaq said in an opinion editorial released Sunday.

"Canadian coastal and northern communities continue to depend upon the humane seal harvest as a vital economic activity and they should have every right to do so."

A WTO dispute settlement panel upheld the EU's embargo on imported seal products in November, saying that while it undermines fair trade, those restrictions can be justified on ``public moral concerns'' for animal welfare.

At issue was a challenge by Canada and Norway of the 28-member EU's 2010 ban on the import and sale of seal fur, meat, blubber and other products.

Aglukkaq said the ban undercuts the livelihood of sealers who rely on the industry to support their families.

"We will continue to work with Canadian sealers to defend this industry as a healthy, humane and sustainable source of food, clothing and income," she said.

Animal rights advocates say the commercial hunt is a needless slaughter and have called the trade ruling a major victory that protects aboriginal hunts.

But critics of the decision, including Inuit hunters, said the European ban and others like it all but wipe out major international markets. They also warned of a dangerous precedent that could be used against other commercial animal products such as beef, pork and poultry.

Regardless of the outcome of the appeal, Sheryl Fink of the International Fund for Animal Welfare said proponents of the seal industry are fighting a losing battle.

"It's a slaughter for a luxury product that people no longer require," Fink said on Sunday from Geneva, where she will attend the hearing as an observer. "Two hundred years ago, we had a reason to kill seals. It was for their blubber that was used to light lamps and to heat buildings."

"That need no longer exists and we're trying to keep an industry alive that really isn't necessary in the 21st century."

The federal Fisheries Department has said that as of this year, all licence holders taking part in the commercial hunt must complete training on its accepted three-step kill process.

It involves first shooting or striking the animal on the head with a hakapik or club, then ensuring the seal is dead before cutting major arteries and bleeding it for at least a minute before skinning it.

The commercial seal hunt off Newfoundland last spring landed about 91,000 harp seals, up from 69,000 the year before, but far short of the federal quota of 400,000. About 900,000 seals are hunted around the world each year, according to the European Commission.

Canada, Norway, Greenland and Namibia all have commercial seal hunts. Countries with bans on imported seal products include the U.S., Mexico, Russia and Taiwan.

Leave a comment:

showing all comments · Subscribe to comments
  1. john posted on 03/17/2014 11:48 AM
    zyzkenny nobody is buying our crap .


    it is a bunch of BS anyways . all these rich people and movie stars who go out there and harass these people trying to make a living . i say if thay wanna stop people from doing it movie stars and rich people should give them money to leave the seals alone . these guys have mortgages ex wifes child support to pay . there is only one session were thay can make money . .
showing all comments

Top stories

BC couple wanted to set off pressure cooker bombs at provincial legislature

Poll

NEWSTALK 1010 reporter Justine Justine Lewkowicz was able to become an UberX driver in two weeks without being interviewed by Uber, either in person or by phone. Does this make you concerned about safety while using Uber?

Voting is restricted to one vote every 24 hours 24 hour(s) VoteResults