Justin Trudeau says opponents of abortion need not apply

Liberal leader says they'll be weeded out

Justin Trudeau says opponents of abortion need not apply to run for the Liberal party in the next election.     And if they do apply, the Liberal leader says they'll be weeded out during the vetting process for nomination applications.

``As a party, we are steadfast in our belief ... that it is not for any government to legislate what a woman chooses to do with her body, and that is the bottom line there,'' Trudeau said Wednesday.

``I have made it clear that future candidates need to be completely understanding that they will be expected to vote pro-choice on any bills.''

Exceptions will be made, however, for incumbent opponents of abortion who became MPs before the party officially adopted a pro-choice stance, such as Toronto MPs John McKay and Judy Sgro.

 Their beliefs will be ``respected to a certain extent,'' Trudeau said, ``but our position as a party is we do not reopen that debate.''

Trudeau revealed the party's new hard line on abortion one day before the annual ``March for Life,'' in which thousands of abortion opponents are expected to descend on Parliament Hill.

In the past, Liberal MPs have been among those who've addressed the March for Life crowds. Opponents of abortion have traditionally formed a strong, vocal minority in the Liberal caucus, although their ranks have thinned considerably over the last two elections as the caucus shrank overall.

Until two years ago, Liberals did not have a party position on abortion, considering it a matter of conscience that should be left to each individual.

However, at their 2012 national convention, delegates for the first time approved a resolution that explicitly endorsed a woman's right to choose whether to have an abortion _ adopting the same position long held by the NDP.

Trudeau said the evolution of the party position was cemented last year when Liberals ``chose a resolutely pro-choice leader with over 80 per cent of the support of militants, of membership.''

Abortion is just one issue on which would-be candidates' views are vetted during the party's so-called green light process for nomination applicants. Their views on same-sex marriage and the Charter of Rights are among the other issues canvassed, Trudeau said.

 ``We make sure that the people who are stepping forward are consistent with the Liberal party as it is now, as it stands under my leadership and under the feedback we're getting from Canadians across the country.''

Trudeau's decision to bar abortion opponents from seeking Liberal nominations brings the party full circle from 1992, when party members gave then-leader Jean Chretien the power to appoint candidates.

That power was deemed necessary to thwart a group that called itself ``Liberals for Life.'' They had taken over a number of Liberal riding associations where they hoped to elect staunch opponents of abortion to carry the party banner in the 1993 election.

Over time, Chretien used the power for a variety of purposes, including to protect incumbents, appoint star recruits and increase the percentage of female candidates.

For his part, Trudeau has said he won't use his power to appoint candidates, promising to allow open, democratic nomination contests in every riding. But he's using the vetting process for nomination applicants to weed out abortion opponents and others considered unsuitable.

Trudeau was initially stumped Wednesday when asked whether he'd allow Liberal MPs such as  McKay to vote freely should an abortion bill come before the House of Commons.

``Well, it's a tough one because one of the things that's a strength of the Liberal party is that we draw in voices from right across the country and on a range of perspectives,'' he said.

Eventually, he added: ``We will see what happens ... when that issue comes up. My preference is that we not be engaging in a discussion of abortion. For me, it's a debate that has been settled for the vast majority of Canadians and we don't need to reopen that issue.''

Leave a comment:

showing all comments · Subscribe to comments
  1. Mike from the hinterland posted on 05/08/2014 06:35 AM
    Really, Justin, so much for the open and inclusive party. Another reason, not to vote for you. You cannot tolerate differences?
    1. Angry Bill posted on 05/08/2014 11:02 AM
      @Mike from the hinterland By that same reasoning, he should allow Holocaust deniers to run in his party, too. I have nothing wrong with a party taking a stance on something, and letting that stance be known.

      It's simple. Now, if you're a pro lifer, it makes it very easy for you. You no longer have to vote liberal. Me, I've always been pro choice. Still not voting liberal, though.
  2. john posted on 05/08/2014 01:17 PM
    hears the thing .

    if i had a girlfriend that was pregnant and she wants to do that . she would no longer be my girlfriend . yes women are untitled to there bodes and all that jazz but i have the right to dump her . thats how i would handle it . i dont wanna be the one releasable for the death of a baby . it will not be me going to hell it will be her .
showing all comments

Sign Up For Breaking News Alerts

Becoming a member only takes 60 seconds! Members get access to exclusive information and products that non-members do not, including concert ticket presales, trips, advance notice on upcoming entertainment events, movie screening passes, music giveaways and more!

Login with Facebook

Top Stories

Today's Poll

Toronto has one team in the playoffs. The Raptors begin their quest for NBA glory. How far do you think they'll go?

Voting is restricted to one vote every 24 hour(s) VoteResults


Stay connected 24/7! Receive breaking news and programming alerts right to your inbox. CLICK HERE to sign-up.