Lawsuit against Rob Ford dismissed at Court of Appeal

Defamation case was filed by George Foulidis, the owner of the Boardwalk Pub...

Ontario's highest court upheld a legal victory Tuesday for Toronto Mayor Rob Ford against a restaurant owner who had sued him for defamation.

In the same decision, the Court of Appeal for Ontario suggested it is ``puzzling'' that Ford's brother, who made similar comments, was not also sued.

George Foulidis had sued Rob Ford over comments the mayor made to the Toronto Sun, when he was a city councillor, suggesting an untendered, 20-year leasing deal between Foulidis's company, Tuggs Inc., and the city was corrupt, saying that it ``stinks to high heaven.''

A lower-court judge dismissed the lawsuit in December 2012, ruling that Foulidis did not prove the comments were directed at him nor that they were defamatory.

Foulidis appealed the decision, but the Court of Appeal for Ontario dismissed it in a ruling released Tuesday. The three-judge panel wrote that it is fair to infer that Ford's comments were not critical of Foulidis personally, but were rather directed at the company and city council. It also noted that Ford ``used strong limiting language,'' in saying in the same interview ``I can't accuse anyone.''

``The trial judge carefully and comprehensively examined Mr. Ford's actual words, their ordinary meaning, and the context in which they were delivered,'' the Appeal Court wrote.

``He concluded that Mr. Ford 'voiced only a suspicion of corruption,' that the focus of his words was on the decision-making process at city council and that the word 'corruption' was linked to council's in camera meetings, and,  importantly, that Mr. Ford explicitly disavowed accusing anyone of corruption, thereby 'clearly and explicitly prevent[ing] any defamatory meaning being perceived in his suspicion of corruption.'''

That conclusion was ``entirely open'' to the trial judge, the Appeal Court wrote.

The court also wrote in its decision that the mayor's brother, Doug Ford, who is now a city councillor, was part of the same interview and said: ``how about a 20-year untendered bid at a lower cost and then you find out the owner's contributing to the guys who are voting for him?''

It ``deserves to be noted,'' the Appeal Court wrote, that two people spoke in the portion of the interview about the Tuggs lease renewal. There is a ``world of difference'' between what each Ford said, the Appeal Court wrote.

``In the end, we are left with a lone and puzzling plaintiff, George Foulidis,'' the court wrote.

``Where is Tuggs Inc.? We are also left with a lone and puzzling defendant, Robert Ford. Where is the Toronto Sun or even Doug Ford?''

Leave a comment:

showing all comments · Subscribe to comments
  1. don was right posted on 07/09/2014 10:45 AM
    Yet again Ford is proven right. When will teh trolls learn?
    1. You are Never Roght posted on 07/09/2014 11:21 AM
      @don was right Could you please repeat that in an acceptable form of English ?
  2. john posted on 07/09/2014 11:07 AM
    good the food sucks the waitress are hot but are to bitchy . lets get chef Ramsay down there and he will tell him to his face his food sucks . in second toughs have him in all the places down there .
    1. john's uncle / daddy posted on 07/09/2014 11:22 AM
      @john Could you please repeat that in an acceptable form of English ?

      Why did I get together with your sister / mommy ?
      If I had only known that you'd be the result !
showing all comments

Sign Up For Breaking News Alerts

Becoming a member only takes 60 seconds! Members get access to exclusive information and products that non-members do not, including concert ticket presales, trips, advance notice on upcoming entertainment events, movie screening passes, music giveaways and more!

Login with Facebook

Stay connected 24/7! Receive breaking news and programming alerts right to your inbox. CLICK HERE to sign-up.

Today's Poll

Toronto Police have revised its policy on carding but it will remain a tool for officers to use. Chief Bill Blair calls it an "essential means to preventing crime" Do you agree?

Voting is restricted to one vote every 24 hour(s) VoteResults

Top Stories