NEWS
 
Lawsuit against Rob Ford dismissed at Court of Appeal
Defamation case was filed by George Foulidis, the owner of the Boardwalk Pub...
4 0

Ontario's highest court upheld a legal victory Tuesday for Toronto Mayor Rob Ford against a restaurant owner who had sued him for defamation.

In the same decision, the Court of Appeal for Ontario suggested it is ``puzzling'' that Ford's brother, who made similar comments, was not also sued.

George Foulidis had sued Rob Ford over comments the mayor made to the Toronto Sun, when he was a city councillor, suggesting an untendered, 20-year leasing deal between Foulidis's company, Tuggs Inc., and the city was corrupt, saying that it ``stinks to high heaven.''

A lower-court judge dismissed the lawsuit in December 2012, ruling that Foulidis did not prove the comments were directed at him nor that they were defamatory.

Foulidis appealed the decision, but the Court of Appeal for Ontario dismissed it in a ruling released Tuesday. The three-judge panel wrote that it is fair to infer that Ford's comments were not critical of Foulidis personally, but were rather directed at the company and city council. It also noted that Ford ``used strong limiting language,'' in saying in the same interview ``I can't accuse anyone.''

``The trial judge carefully and comprehensively examined Mr. Ford's actual words, their ordinary meaning, and the context in which they were delivered,'' the Appeal Court wrote.

``He concluded that Mr. Ford 'voiced only a suspicion of corruption,' that the focus of his words was on the decision-making process at city council and that the word 'corruption' was linked to council's in camera meetings, and,  importantly, that Mr. Ford explicitly disavowed accusing anyone of corruption, thereby 'clearly and explicitly prevent[ing] any defamatory meaning being perceived in his suspicion of corruption.'''

That conclusion was ``entirely open'' to the trial judge, the Appeal Court wrote.

The court also wrote in its decision that the mayor's brother, Doug Ford, who is now a city councillor, was part of the same interview and said: ``how about a 20-year untendered bid at a lower cost and then you find out the owner's contributing to the guys who are voting for him?''

It ``deserves to be noted,'' the Appeal Court wrote, that two people spoke in the portion of the interview about the Tuggs lease renewal. There is a ``world of difference'' between what each Ford said, the Appeal Court wrote.

``In the end, we are left with a lone and puzzling plaintiff, George Foulidis,'' the court wrote.

``Where is Tuggs Inc.? We are also left with a lone and puzzling defendant, Robert Ford. Where is the Toronto Sun or even Doug Ford?''

Categories:

Leave a comment:

showing all comments · Subscribe to comments
  1. don was right posted on 07/09/2014 10:45 AM
    Yet again Ford is proven right. When will teh trolls learn?
    1. You are Never Roght posted on 07/09/2014 11:21 AM
      @don was right Could you please repeat that in an acceptable form of English ?
  2. john posted on 07/09/2014 11:07 AM
    good the food sucks the waitress are hot but are to bitchy . lets get chef Ramsay down there and he will tell him to his face his food sucks . in second toughs have him in all the places down there .
    1. john's uncle / daddy posted on 07/09/2014 11:22 AM
      @john Could you please repeat that in an acceptable form of English ?

      Why did I get together with your sister / mommy ?
      If I had only known that you'd be the result !
showing all comments

@NEWSTALK1010

Facebook

DON'T MISS

DONATE TO NEPAL

NEPAL NEEDS YOUR HELP

The Humanitarian Coalition is responding to the devastating earthquake in Nepal with a national joint appeal

IN-DEPTH AND INTERACTIVE

TICKETS ARE NOW SOLD OUT!

Aaron Waxman & Associates present the 4th annual IN-DEPTH AND INTERACTIVE -- May 19 at the Liberty Grand

NEWS ALERTS

STAY CONNECTED

Sign up for out Breaking News Alerts and receive up-to-the-minute coverage of the top stories of the day

 
4 0

Ontario's highest court upheld a legal victory Tuesday for Toronto Mayor Rob Ford against a restaurant owner who had sued him for defamation.

In the same decision, the Court of Appeal for Ontario suggested it is ``puzzling'' that Ford's brother, who made similar comments, was not also sued.

George Foulidis had sued Rob Ford over comments the mayor made to the Toronto Sun, when he was a city councillor, suggesting an untendered, 20-year leasing deal between Foulidis's company, Tuggs Inc., and the city was corrupt, saying that it ``stinks to high heaven.''

A lower-court judge dismissed the lawsuit in December 2012, ruling that Foulidis did not prove the comments were directed at him nor that they were defamatory.

Foulidis appealed the decision, but the Court of Appeal for Ontario dismissed it in a ruling released Tuesday. The three-judge panel wrote that it is fair to infer that Ford's comments were not critical of Foulidis personally, but were rather directed at the company and city council. It also noted that Ford ``used strong limiting language,'' in saying in the same interview ``I can't accuse anyone.''

``The trial judge carefully and comprehensively examined Mr. Ford's actual words, their ordinary meaning, and the context in which they were delivered,'' the Appeal Court wrote.

``He concluded that Mr. Ford 'voiced only a suspicion of corruption,' that the focus of his words was on the decision-making process at city council and that the word 'corruption' was linked to council's in camera meetings, and,  importantly, that Mr. Ford explicitly disavowed accusing anyone of corruption, thereby 'clearly and explicitly prevent[ing] any defamatory meaning being perceived in his suspicion of corruption.'''

That conclusion was ``entirely open'' to the trial judge, the Appeal Court wrote.

The court also wrote in its decision that the mayor's brother, Doug Ford, who is now a city councillor, was part of the same interview and said: ``how about a 20-year untendered bid at a lower cost and then you find out the owner's contributing to the guys who are voting for him?''

It ``deserves to be noted,'' the Appeal Court wrote, that two people spoke in the portion of the interview about the Tuggs lease renewal. There is a ``world of difference'' between what each Ford said, the Appeal Court wrote.

``In the end, we are left with a lone and puzzling plaintiff, George Foulidis,'' the court wrote.

``Where is Tuggs Inc.? We are also left with a lone and puzzling defendant, Robert Ford. Where is the Toronto Sun or even Doug Ford?''

Leave a comment:

showing all comments · Subscribe to comments
  1. don was right posted on 07/09/2014 10:45 AM
    Yet again Ford is proven right. When will teh trolls learn?
    1. You are Never Roght posted on 07/09/2014 11:21 AM
      @don was right Could you please repeat that in an acceptable form of English ?
  2. john posted on 07/09/2014 11:07 AM
    good the food sucks the waitress are hot but are to bitchy . lets get chef Ramsay down there and he will tell him to his face his food sucks . in second toughs have him in all the places down there .
    1. john's uncle / daddy posted on 07/09/2014 11:22 AM
      @john Could you please repeat that in an acceptable form of English ?

      Why did I get together with your sister / mommy ?
      If I had only known that you'd be the result !
showing all comments

Top stories

Long-time Toronto taxi drivers tell NEWSTALK 1010 that even before the boom of so-called 'crowd-sourced' drivers, it was a struggle to make ends meet.

Poll

Based on the ombudsman's report, do you think city hall security gave too much special treatment to former mayor Rob Ford?

Voting is restricted to one vote every 24 hours 24 hour(s) VoteResults