THE LIVE DRIVE BLOG

The Truth Behind the Firing of Brian Burke - By: Mike Toth

Posted By: Live Drive with John Tory · 1/9/2013 5:57:00 PM

There's no question Tom Anselmi, president of MLSE, is a media savvy, fan friendly guy. But during today's media conference to announce the shocking firing of Leaf GM Brian Burke, Anselmi really let the fans down. No matter how hard he was pushed by reporters, Anselmi kep replying that he "didn't want to get into specifics" about the reason for Burke's sudden dismissal. Anselmi did mention the Leaf's late season collapse last year that saw them miss the play-offs again - a place they've never visited under Burke's watch. But that fold job was nine months ago, so why wait until ten days before a lockout-shortened schedule to bring out the axe? The lockout, by the way, is another reason why Anselmi owed the fans more answers. Like all NHL teams, the Leafs are trying to win back fed-up fans coming out of the labour war and keeping them in the dark regarding the reasons for chopping the leader of the franchise isn't exactly inspiring your most important shareholders (the people in the seats) to keep buying tickets and over-priced hot dogs.
 
So, since Leaf fans deserve more answers about why the team said bye-bye to Burkie, read on.
 
Over the summer, there were published reports that Burke was having marital problems, and a lot of hockey insiders also say he's never been the same after the death of his son a few years ago. In fact, there was talk a few months ago that Burke might step down because of all the stress in his life, although that obviously didn't happen.
 
With the above in mind, however, at today's newser I asked Anselmi if Burke's personal life or his many well-documented blow-ups with the media (including going off on our very own John Moore of "Moore in the Morning") had anything to do with the firing. The media angle is relevant, of course, because the Leafs are now owned by the Bell and Rogers media consortium. However, Anselmi claimed Burke's dismissal was not due to either of those issues.
 
Why, then, was Burke let go?
 
Well, as Anselmi said, it was "a combination of factors". But again, since he refused to get into specifics, let's fill in the blanks. The Leafs losing ways were definitely a factor, especially when you consider the team isn't much different than a year ago and there's not much hope of snapping their 8-year play-off drought this season. Meanwhile, Despite what Anselmi says, I do believe Burke's frequent media meltdowns (and based on that, who knows how he dealt with his own employees around the office?) were a factor in today's decision.
 
Another thing?
 
Don't underestimate the Blue Jays and Alex Anthopoulos angle. AA is a young, media friendly guy who's the toast of the town right now for building the Jays into a contender in quick and dramatic fashion, while Burke and the Leafs muddle down near the NHL basement. The Jays, remember, are also owned by Rogers and I believe they and their Bell buddies simply came to regard Burke as being more trouble than he's worth; a losing team with a crusty boss who was becoming increasingly unpopular among both the fans and media mob.
 
In Burke's replacement, former assistant GM Dave Nonis, the Leafs have a bright, young Anthopoulos-type clone whose already been a fulltime GM in Vancouver. Nonis isn't exactly "Mr. Personality", but he's not going to blow up at reporters and publicly embarrass a media-savvy company who wants to be more fan-friendly, especially post-lockout, while also icing a winning team to keep those TV rating points headed in the right direction.
 
With that in mind, Burke's firing might also help the Leafs in their rumoured quest to bring veteran netminder Roberto Luongo to Toronto. Among Burke's many adversaries? Canucks GM Mike Gillis, who Burke has a long history of feuding with, and there was no way those guys were ever going to hook up on a deal. Yes, Gillis took over in Vancouver after Nonis was fired by the Canucks in 2008. But Nonis is a lot more even-keeled than Burke and should be able to do a better job of breaking bread with Gillis to potentially get Luongo in a blue and white jersey.
 
Another guy Burke had issues with?
 
Yours truly.
 
I was upset with Burke for dressing down my good buddy John Moore on Newstalk 1010, after John asked Brian a perfectly legit question about his future as Leaf GM. In an exchange of emails with Burke, I said "Brian, you're a good hockey man but I don't like how you bullied John." Out of respect for Burke, I'll keep his reply private; suffice to say it didn't exactly express any regret for his outburst.
 
But as it turned out, John's question about Burke's job status did have merit and in the end, maybe a big bully got what was coming to him.   

Written By: Mike Toth

Leave a comment:

showing all comments · Subscribe to comments
  1. rolex replica posted on 03/18/2013 10:29 PM
    Alice seeking to lead their particular safety. Relating to implemented the fresh smaller population center infested zombie Los angeles journey, Alice, this is a treadmill. Side-to-side along with the girl older buddy Claire Redfield (Ali Larter), Alice went to the patio umbrella company.
  2. Bruce Wayne posted on 03/31/2013 12:54 PM
    Titanic chairs and the band plays on ...

    The ship called Ontario is sinking ...

    Low info voters will lap up the insurance roll back and allow
    the Liberals to remain in power ...

    We are sinking because the hull has been breached with many holes ...

    Plugging the financial leaks will only slow down the drowning

    There are moral holes low info voter holes public union holes
    and a giant hole caused by a few getting fat off the many and those few
    will vote liberal to keep getting fat the list is leaning farther left and even
    if some all stand on the right they will not right the ship called Ontario
  3. Lanny Javier posted on 03/31/2013 01:36 PM
    Marriage is an institution established, by tradition, practice, religion or law, since the beginning of time; since the beginning of human society. It is an institution that confers special rights and privileges only to those that qualify. The requisite qualifications are:

    1. The ability to procreate; to ensure the continued survival of the human specie.

    2. The ability to provide unique care and nurturing of the succeeding generation.

    3. The ability to form a natural family with the above set of qualifications.

    The issue of marriage is not an issue about equal rights for persons based on their sexual behaviour and their gender preferences. The issue is not about moral rights, religious rights, or civil rights. The issue is about children’s rights and the preservation of the human family, an essential social unit that a child needs to grow and develop properly and naturally. Who speaks for the children in the current debate? A child is entitled to be raised and cared for by a mother and a father (and, ahem, grandparents). Only a female can provide a mother’s care, in the same manner that only a male can provide a father’s care. A child needs both.

    The focus should be about the rights of the children, and of the natural social order and functioning of the human family. A child is entitled to be raised in a normal natural family environment, and to belong to a family with normal genetic hierarchical structure; in other words, a normal family tree.

    It is true that divorces and serial marriages result in unnatural hybrid families with complicated family structures, and this is an unfortunate aberration. But must we further complicate and extend this aberration by conferring the marriage right and privilege to the unqualified— the homosexuals and lesbians with their subversive agenda? Should we risk unexpected long-term consequences with this foolhardy social tinkering?

    We all have to accept and live with our individual disqualifications. I sure wish to be a player in the NBA but I don’t have, and will never acquire, the required qualifications. Should I impose my wish on society by asking for legislation, or Supreme Court ruling to make me an NBA player?
  4. Judi posted on 04/04/2013 12:49 PM
    So Brian Burke is rumoured to have had a bit of a skate with one of the employees of home ice and might become a new Daddy! My goodness, the things that go on with people who wear skates! Shocking! But it's all just a nasty rumour ... isn't it?
showing all comments